In Admissibility of Financial Crimes Evidence — Part 2C, we continue our review of the financial crimes evidence debate with the final part of our look at the in-camera direct examination of Jeanie Seckinger, who details allegations of over $7 million in financial theft by the defendant from his firm and his clients.

Crime Story Media has begun to migrate content from the CrimeStory.com website to our Patreon

For more of Crime Story and Jury Duty — including ad-free episodes of the upcoming season; Kary Antholis’s Storyteller Interviews with ground-breaking, award-winning storytellers like David Simon and George Pelecanos; and all of our Amanda Knox Project opinion pieces and interviews— subscribe on Patreon for just $5 per month.

Previous articleS8 E49: The Trial of Alex Murdaugh: Admissibility of Financial Crimes Evidence — Part 2B
Next articleS8 E51: The Trial of Alex Murdaugh: Admissibility of Financial Crimes Evidence — Part 2D