In Financial Crimes Evidence — Pt 11, we conclude our review of the in camera testimony of Mark Tinsley, the lawyer who represented the family of Mallory Beach in their suit against the Murdaugh family for the death of Ms. Beach in a boating accident caused by Paul Murdaugh. 

Defense attorney Phillip Barber seeks to challenge Mr. Tinsley’s assessment that Alex Murdaugh faced a day of reckoning for his financial crimes caused by the discovery motions that Tinsley made on behalf of the Beach family. Prosecutor Creighton Waters uses his rebuttal to allow the witness to offer additional testimony supporting his assessment.

Crime Story Media has begun to migrate content from the website to our Patreon

For more of Crime Story and Jury Duty — including ad-free episodes of the upcoming season; Kary Antholis’s Storyteller Interviews with ground-breaking, award-winning storytellers like David Simon and George Pelecanos; and all of our Amanda Knox Project opinion pieces and interviews— subscribe on Patreon for just $5 per month.

Previous articleS8 E71: The Trial of Alex Murdaugh: Financial Crimes Evidence — Pt 10
Next articleS8 E73: The Trial of Alex Murdaugh: Financial Crimes Evidence — The Judge’s Decision (Pt 12)